SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATNAM SINGH @ SATTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


CRR No. 2947 of 2016 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CRR No. 2947 of 2016 (O&M)

Date of decision: 03.03.2017

Satnam Singh @ Satta

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present:

Mr. R.P. Dhir., Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

****

Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)

By way of the present criminal revision, the petitioner

has challenged the impugned order dated 09.08.2016 (Annexure P-

4), passed by Judge Special Court, Hoshiarpur whereby, the

application under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., filed by the petitioner was

dismissed and application under Section 36(A) of NDPS Act for

extension of time period, filed by the prosecution was allowed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the

petitioner was arrested on 09.01.2016 and produced on 10.01.2016.

The 180 days were to expire on 08.07.2016. The prosecution filed an

application for extension of time on 04.07.2016 and another

extension was granted on 09.08.2016 which was beyond the period

Sumit Kumar

2017.03.27 16:53

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this document

CRR No. 2947 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top