ESA-13-2014

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Execution Second Appeal No.13 of 2014 (O&M)

Date of Decision: February 28, 2019.

Rakesh Kumar Chopra

..........APPELLANT(s).

VERSUS

Hawa Singh and others

........RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate

for the appellant (s).

Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate

for the respondents No.1 to 7 and 10.

None for respondent No.14.

*******

SURINDER GUPTA, J.

Har Lal (since deceased, now represented by his legal

representatives) was a tenant in the shop in dispute. The facts of his

litigation with the landlord as enumerated in para 9 of the Order passed by

Additional District Judge, Hisar are reproduced as follows:-

“In the present case, the decree holder was a tenant in the

suit property and he instituted one suit against his

landlord namely Roop Ram seeking a decree for

permanent injunction restraining the landlord from

dispossessing him forcibly and order of injunction was

issued in his favour. The landlord/owner sold the

property in favour of defendants No.2 to 4 namely Kiru

Ram, Wazir Singh and Sher Singh during pen