SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KARAN SINGH AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
GINDORI AND ORS – Respondent


R.S.A. No.3408 of 2006

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

R.S.A. No.3408 of 2006

Date of Decision:- 12.12.2006

Karan Singh & anr.

....Appellant(s)

through

Mr.Akshay Bhan, Advocate

vs.

Smt.Gindori & ors.

....Respondent(s)

through

None.

***

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

***

SURYA KANT, J.

This regular second appeal is at the instance of the defendants

and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 15.2.2002 passed by

the learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), Rewari which has been further

upheld by the learned Additional District Judge, Rewari vide his judgment

and decree dated 21.4.2006. Vide the aforementioned judgments, the suit

for declaration filed by the plaintiff-respondents to the effect that they are

owners in possession of the agricultural land, fully described in the

headnote of the plaint, has been decreed.

The facts may be briefly noticed. The respondent-plaintiffs are

widow and daughter of Jeeva Ram. The appellants are sons of brother of

Jeeva Ram. Admittedly, Jeeva Ram was owner in possession of the subject

property. According to the respondent-plaintiffs, Jeeva Ram died on

8.10.1993 and he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top