SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KINDER KAUR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Sr. No. 113

CWP-9482-2022 (O&M)

Date of decision : 06.05.2022

Kinder Kaur and others

..... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others

..... Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL

Present:

Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate, for the petitioners.

*****

SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

Four separate applications were filed for partition of land

comprised in different khewats. The partition proceedings commenced on

08.10.2013 and concluded on 19.12.2014. Sanad was issued on 21.05.2015.

A perusal of the record shows that the petitioners have the

following grievances against the sanad:-

(i) Proceedings were completed within ten hearings.

(ii) Section 20 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 having

been violated.

(iii) No opportunity granted to the parties to object to the

Naksha Urra.

(iv) Clubbing of land comprised in four separate khewats and

(v) Grant of more valuable land to the private respondents.

The first argument raised is that the clubbing of four separate

khewats in which the co-sharers were different wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top