HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
BALJIT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
TEHAL SINGH AND ORS. – Respondent
/1603/2022
CR 1603 of 2022 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR 1603 of 2022 (O&M)
Date of Decision: April 29, 2022
Baljit Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
Tehal Singh and others
... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present :
Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate
for the petitioner.
FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (Oral)
By way of this revision petition under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India by petitioner Baljit Kaur through her
attorney Nirmal Singh has sought to set aside the order dated
02.04.2022 (Annexure P-7) passed by the learned Civil Judge,
Junior Division, Phillaur, whereby, an application for
appointment of the Local Commissioner stands dismissed.
Heard Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate for the petitioner
and perused the records.
AMIT RANA
2022.05.12 13:33
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh
CR 1603 of 2022 (O&M)
2
The present petitioner then plaintiff had filed a suit
for permanent injunction directing the defendants to vacate the
street after removing the obstruction thereon in the property duly
described and depicted in the head note of the plaint.
The primary grounds in the plaint was that she was
owner of the property detailed in her pleadings and that street
leads to her house for the purpose of ingress and outgress and
which is only street which has been illegally and forcibly
obstructed by the respondents by parking a trolley in the street.
During the pendency of the suit, an application by
the plaintiff/petitioner for appointment of local commissioner to
visit the spot and report as to the actual position of this street in
question was moved and vide order dated 02.04.2022, the
Court of learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Phillaur, dismissed
the application.
Appreciating the submissions, Order 26 Rule 9 CPC
vests in the Court immense power in any suit in which the Court
deems it necessary that the local investigation is necessary may
AMIT RANA
2022.05.12 13:33
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh
CR 1603 of 2022 (O&M)
3
for the purposes of elucidating any matter in dispute can
ascertain through local commissioner to construe the state of
position. The stand of the defendants/respondents is that
plaintiff/petitioner had other ways to access to her home and the
street in question is one of the many streets that surrounds the
areas for the use of public. It is contended that it is the own
stand of the petitioner that she in no manner elucidated that how
the parking of a mere trolley was causing hindrance and a
cause of concern which affects her easmentary rights. Since
the suit has been filed by the plaintiff, the onus lay upon her to
establish through evidence her case to the hilt and cannot be
allowed to create evidence through appointment of local
commissioner. The Court below has given a well reasoned
order and there apparently appears to be no merit in the instant
petition, which as such stands dismissed in limine.
April 29, 2022
(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
amit rana
JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking :
Yes/No
Whether reportable
:
Yes/No
AMIT RANA
2022.05.12 13:33
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh