SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MOTI RAM – Appellant
Versus
MANJIT KAUR AND ANR – Respondent


CR No. 1651 of 2019 (O&M)

-1-

115

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CR No. 1651 of 2019 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 11.03.2019

Moti Ram

-Petitioner

Vs

Manjit Kaur and another

-Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Bhateja, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

****

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Petitioner has assailed the order dated 23.01.2019

passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Amloh,

District Fatehgarh Sahib vide which his application for staying

the execution proceedings was dismissed.

Perusal of the record would show that the petitioner

has improved his status from tenant to that of co-sharer by

purchasing 1 Biswas- 7 Biswasis from Gurpreet Kaur vide sale

deed dated 18.09.2014.

At the time of sanctioning of mutation, Manjit Kaur

had no objection to the aforesaid mutation.

It is a settled principle of law that the tenant after

passing of decree for ejectment has to surrender possession in

Jyoti Yadav

2019.03.13 15:20

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this document

CR No. 1651 of 2019 (O&M)

-2-

prior point of time and thereafter, he can seek partition on the

basis of his improved status a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top