114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: August 05, 2014 Gura Singh ...Petitioner Versus Hira Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH Present: Mr.Amrik Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this civil revision against respondents under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 16.05.2014 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patti, vide which the application under Order 32 Rule 15 filed by the defendant-petitioner has been dismissed and the application of respondent-plaintiff under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC has been allowed, whereas the cause to proceed with the suit do not survive as no enquiry as mandatory under Order 32 Rule 15 was carried out at the time of filing of suit or during the pendency of the suit till the death of the petitioner allegedly stated to be insane.

Learned counsel for the petitioner mainly argued that enquiry is mandatory under Order 32 Rule 15 CPC by the Court to hold that whether the party is of insane mind or not.

VINEET GULATI

2014.09.02 17:06 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and ha