SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3584

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
VED SINGH (SINCE DECEASED TH LRS) – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHWAR (SINCE DECEASED THR HIS LRS) AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on 18.11.2022 Date of Decision: 06.01.2023 Ved Singh (since deceased) through LRs .... Petitioner Versus Rameshwar (since deceased) through LRs and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. RakeshNehra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate and Mr. Ankit Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Puneet Jindal Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gautam Goel, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. Mr. A.P.S.Nain, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 8.

***

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.

This revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 12.07.2022 MANINDER

2023.01.06 13:54 (Annexure P-6) whereby the Executing Court allowed the respondents/plaintiffs/decree holders’ application (hereinafter referred to as 'decree holders') to deposit the balance sale consideration amount in terms of the judgment and decree dated 01.02.2011 (Annexure P-1).

2. The facts of the case in brief are, an agreement to sell was entered into between the parties on 23.08.2004 to get the sale deed executed and registered in favo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top