HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
NIVEDITA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent
CWP 16387/2009
Civil Writ Petition No.16387 of 2009 [ 1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.16387 of 2009
Date of decision: March 19, 2012
Nivedita Sharma
....Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present:
Ms. Nivedita Sharma, petitioner in person.
Shri Aman Chaudhary, Additional AG, Haryana.
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
The petitioner has challenged the legality of the circular
dated 27.3.2009
(Annexure P.3) issued by the Financial
Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana,
Town and Country Planning Department, as violative of the provisions
of the Constitution of India.
The petitioner relies upon an agreement to sell dated
10.1.2008 in respect of purchase of the basement of a residential
building bearing Number F-5/5 measuring 550 sq. ft. in a licenced
plotted colony “DLF Qutab Enclave”, Phase-I, Gurgaon, entered with
Rahul Bansal. The said Rahul Bansal has purchased the property
from a builder, namely, Shri Vikram Vij on 12.3.2001. It is alleged
that the Government has stopped registration of individual floors
without any valid reasons. The petitioner alleges that a circular has
been issued on 27.3.2009 whereby the floor-wise registration of the
property has been permitted, but it is stipulated therein that
basement cannot be registered independently and can be registered
Civil Writ Petition No.16387 of 2009 [ 2]
only along with the ground floor. It is the said circular, which is
challenged by the petitioner, in the present writ petition.
In support of the plea that the sale deed in respect of the
basement alone can be registered, in the replication filed by the
petitioner, a reference is made to a sale deed dated 25.1.2010
executed by Mrs. Saroj Verma on favour of one Shri Baljeet Singh
Rathee.
In the written statement, the respondents have pointed
out that on 23.7.2009, the Haryana Development and Regulation of
Urban Areas Act, 1975 (for short `the Act') was amended when Section
3-C was inserted by Haryana Ordinance No 7 of 2009, since
substituted by Haryana Act No.18 of 2009. Section 3-C contemplated
transfer, sale, gift, exchange, lease in perpetuity of independent
dwelling units in any residential colony, which has been granted
licence under the aforesaid Act. The proviso to said provision
contemplates that the registration shall be limited to the dwelling limit
of each floor with an overall unit of three dwelling units on each
residential plot. It is also pointed out that the basement in a
residential plot is free of Floor Area Ratio and is meant for the use of
bona-fide residents of the plot and is not allowed to be sold to any
other party for any other independent use. The circular issued on
27.3.2009 clarifies that the basement, if any, allowed in a residential
building shall not constitute a separate sub division/floor. However,
in case owners of different independent floors in building intend and
agree to use basement as a common area for facilities such as parking
or other plant and equipment required for different floors in the
building they may have undivided proportionate right in the
basement.
Civil Writ Petition No.16387 of 2009 [ 3]
In a reply filed on behalf of the Tehsildar, Gurgaon, it is
pointed out that the State Government has issued a Notification on
25.9.2002 in exercise of Section 7-A of the Haryana Development and
Regulation of Urban Area Act, 1975 whereby, the area of Gurgaon as
specified in Schedule given in the said Notification, was declared as
an urban area. After declaration of such area as urban area, the
District T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.