SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
VINOD KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
MADAN LAL CHAWLA – Respondent


R.S.A No.384 of 2013(O&M)

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

RSA No.384 of 2013 (O&M)

Date of Decision:12.12.2019

Vinod Kumar Gupta

......Appellant

Versus

Madan Lal Chawla

...... Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate

for the appellant.

Mr. G.S.Nagra, Advocate

for the respondent.

*****

LISA GILL,

J.

Appellant-plaintiff, has filed this appeal being aggrieved of

judgment and decree dated 23.11.2010, passed by the learned Additional

Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Rajpura, as well as judgment and decree dated

04.10.2012, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala,

whereby suit filed by the appellant-plaintiff, has been dismissed.

Present appeal has been filed challenging both the said

judgements and decrees.

Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the case are that the

appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement to

sell dated 24.05.2005 in respect to the suit property as described in the plaint

and in the alternate for recovery of `6,37,200/-. It is further prayed that in

case the Court reaches a conclusion that `4,12,200/- was not receive

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top