HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MOHAMMAD IKBAL – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent
/2012/2020
LAMBARDAR APPOINTMENT - MERIT - JUDICIAL REVIEW - [LAMBARDAR APPOINTMENT ACT, 1952]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the appointment of respondent No.5 as Lambardar of village Chahalka, claiming that he was a better candidate. The Collector had appointed respondent No.5 based on his education, social work, financial status, and support from villagers. The Commissioner remanded the matter, finding respondent No.6 to be a better candidate. The Financial Commissioner upheld the Collector's order, finding respondent No.5 to be more meritorious and dismissing the Commissioner's observation of illegal possession of panchayat land as incorrect.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the Collector's choice of Lambardar is final and cannot be lightly interfered with unless there is perversity or illegality. The Court found no infirmity or perversity in the Collector's order and upheld the appointment of respondent No.5 as Lambardar.
Issues: 1. Whether the Collector's appointment of respondent No.5 as Lambardar was valid and in accordance with law. 2. Whether the Commissioner erred in remanding the matter and finding respondent No.6 to be a better candidate. 3. Whether the Financial Commissioner erred in upholding the Collector's order and dismissing the Commissioner's observation of illegal possession of panchayat land.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The choice of the Collector in appointing a Lambardar is final and cannot be interfered with unless it suffers from infirmity or perversity. 2. The Court will not interfere with the Collector's choice even if two views are possible. 3. The Commissioner cannot lightly set aside the Collector's order and can only do so if there is perversity or illegality in the order.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Collector's appointment of respondent No.5 as Lambardar.
CWP-2012-2020
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(103)
CWP-2012-2020
Date of decision: - 10.01.2023
Mohammad Iqbal
....Petitioner
Versus
Financial Commissioner, Department of Revenue Haryana and
others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present:-
Mr. Nafeesh Ahmed, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms. Upasana Dhawan, AAG, Haryana.
****
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of
the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari/mandamus for
quashing the impugned order dated 06.05.2013 passed by the Assistant
Collector 1st Class, Nuh (Annexure P-2); order dated 16.07.2013
(Annexure P-8), passed by the Collector Mewat, Nuh; order dated
21.08.2014 (Annexure P-12), passed by the Commissioner Gurgaon as
well as order dated 22.05.2017 (Annexure P-14) passed by the Financial
Commissioner, Haryana, with a further prayer to appoint the petitioner as
Lambardar of village Chahalka, Tehsil Tauru, District Nuh (Mewat),
Haryana.
The brief facts of the present case are that after the death of
grandfather of the petitioner, namely, Hussain Khan, Lambardar of the
NARESH KUMAR
2023.01.17 14:34
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
order/judgement
CWP-2012-2020
-2-
village Chahalka, the process for filling up the post of Lambardar was
initiated and munadi was conducted. In pursuance of the same, nine
persons including the present petitioner as well as respondent No.5-
Nishar Ahmed and respondent No.6-Khurshid had filed their
applications for the post. One of the candidates, namely, Nafees Ahmed
had withdrawn his candidature in favour of respondent No.5-Nishar
Ahmed. Certain candidates did not appear before the Assistant Collector,
2nd Grade, Tauru, thus, exparte proceedings were initiated and only four
candidates were ultimately in the running for the post of Lambardar. The
said four candidates included the present petitioner, respondents No.5 and
6 and one Jamshed. The Collector, after considering the merits and
demerits of the candidates, appointed respondent No.5 as the new
Lambardar. While passing order dated 16.07.2013 (Annexure P-8), it was
observed that respondent No.5 was the best candidate, inasmuch as,
respondent No.5 was a graduate and he possessed the degree of B.A. and
had studied Urdu till 12th class and was more educated than the other
candidates including the present petitioner, who had only passed class
10th and further, respondent No.4 also owned land measuring 43 kanals
and 1 marla and being a social worker, had built a water tank in the high
school of village Sundh and had also installed a hand-pump and was
given certificates of appreciation by the Aaganwadi Department,
Education Department, Animal Husbandry Department, Mining
Department and the Agriculture Department. It had also been observed
that as many as 23 persons had supported the candidature of respondent
No.5 and 34 persons had given separate appreciation certificates in favour
NARESH KUMAR
2023.01.17 14:34
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
order/judgement
CWP-2012-2020
-3-
of respondent No.5. In addition to the above, it was also found that
respondent No.5 was financially well off and apart from the land
measuring 43 kanals and 1 marla owned by him, he also had deposits of
Rs.2,16,000/- in small savings account, which was more than the other
candidates. The statement of respondent No.5, in which it was mentioned
that respondent No.5, in addition to the above, also had two plots of 575
sq. yards in the town of Tauru and a land measuring 304 square yards in
Town Punhana and a concrete house and the fact that he was
recommended by the Assistant Collector, Grade I, Nuh, vide order dated
06.05.2013 (Annexure P-2), was also taken into consideration.
Respondent No.6-Khurshid and the present petitioner challenged the said
order of the Collector by f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.