RSA No. 3349 of 2008

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

RSA No. 3349 of 2008

Date of Decision: 24. 10. 2008

Bhanwar Singh and another

......Appellants

Versus

Smt.Dayawati alias Daya

...... Respondent

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.P.R. Yadav, Advocate

for the appellants.

***

Ajay Tewari, J.

This appeal has been filed by a mortgagor against a decree for

redemption passed by the Lower Appellate Court.

The main argument of learned counsel for the appellants is that

the respondent-plaintiff had not disclosed to the Court earlier litigations

filed by her for redemption and for injunction and on the contrary when

those litigations had been referred to in the written statement the same had

been denied by the respondent-plaintiff in her replication. He has also

urged that in case of Daljit Singh v. State of Punjab reported as 1997(1)

PLR 553, a Division Bench of this Court had held as follows:-

“We are constrained to take a serious view of the suppression

RSA No. 3349