SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
LADI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


CRR Nos.398, 399 & 400 of 2013 -:1:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision: May 02, 2013

1.

CRR No. 398 of 2013 (O&M)

Laddi

.... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

... Respondent

2.

CRR No. 399 of 2013 (O&M)

Laddi

.... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

... Respondent

3.

CRR No. 400 of 2013 (O&M)

Laddi

.... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH

1)

Whether Reporters of the Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

2)

To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes

3)

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate,

for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Sandeep S. Mann, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

Mr. D.R.Singla, Advocate,

for the complainant.

Paramjeet Singh, J.

By this common order, Criminal Revision Petitions viz. CRR

CRR Nos.398, 399 & 400 of 2013 -:2:-

No. 398 of 2013, CRR No. 399 of 2013 and CRR No. 400 of 2013 are

being decided together as the same arise out of FIR No. 94, dated

17.08.2012, registered at Police

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top