SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
G.M. NIGAM TRANSPORT – Appellant
Versus
KARTAR SINGH – Respondent


In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

R.S.A. No. 1840 of 1987

Date of Decision: November 27, 2009

The General Manager, Nigam Transport, Municipal Corporation,

Amritsar and another

…Appellants

Versus

Kartar Singh

…Respondent

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR

Present:

Mr. T.S. Gujral, Advocate,

for the appellants.

None for the respondent.

1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in

the Digest?

M.M. KUMAR, J.

This appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, ‘the Code’) challenges concurrent

findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below holding that the

order Nos. 478-83/TA/AMI, dated 3.9.1980; 472-70/TA/AMI, dated

3.9.1980 and 968-69/AMI, dated 21.10.1981 (mentioned at Sr. Nos.

(i), (ii) and (iv) of the head note of the plaint), stopping one annual

grade increment each with cumulative effect of the plaintiff-

respondent, are illegal and set aside. The suit of the plaintiff-

RSA No. 1840 of 1987

respondent qua said orders has been decreed whereas the validity of

order No. 189-94/AMI, dated 26.2.1981, inflicting punishment of

stoppage of one

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top