HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RISHI LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
CRR 2629/2011
CRIMINAL REVISION NO.2629 OF 2011 :{ 1 }:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 08, 2011
Rishi Lal
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
PRESENT:
Mr. T. S. Sangha, Sr.Advocate with
Mr. H. S. Sangha, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab,
for the State.
****
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The petitioner was prosecuted for offences under
Sections 304A and 427 IPC. He was convicted and
sentenced to undergo RI for a period of one and a half years
under Section 304A IPC coupled with fine of `2,000/-. In
default of payment of fine, he was further directed to
undergo RI for one month.
The petitioner was driving Haryana Roadways bus,
CRIMINAL REVISION NO.2629 OF 2011 :{ 2 }:
which hit the scooter. The petitioner claims that he is an
excellent driver and has been driving the bus for
continuously number of years. He has also been given
certificate in this regard. Counsel accordingly pleads that
case for release of the petitioner on probation is made out.
Contrary to this, the State counsel has placed
before me a judgement in the case of Dalbir Singh Vs.
State of Haryana, (2000) 5 Supreme Court cases 82, where
the Hon'ble Supreme Court has not approved the action of
the Courts in releasing the persons convicted for offence
under Section 304A on probation by giving benefit of the
Probation of Offenders Act.
Without going into this aspect any further, I think
case for showing some leniency is made out. As per the
custody certificate placed on record today in Court, the
petitioner has already undergone sentence of about 2
months.
Taking the totality of the circumstances in view,
the sentence as imposed under Section 304A IPC is reduced
from one and half years to one year RI. However, the fine
as awarded under Section 304A IPC shall remain same.
With the above modification in the sentence, the
revision petition is dismissed.
December 08, 2011
( RANJIT SINGH )
khurmi
JUDGE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.