SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RISHI LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


CRIMINAL REVISION NO.2629 OF 2011 :{ 1 }:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 08, 2011

Rishi Lal

.....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

....Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

PRESENT:

Mr. T. S. Sangha, Sr.Advocate with

Mr. H. S. Sangha, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab,

for the State.

****

RANJIT SINGH, J.

The petitioner was prosecuted for offences under

Sections 304A and 427 IPC. He was convicted and

sentenced to undergo RI for a period of one and a half years

under Section 304A IPC coupled with fine of `2,000/-. In

default of payment of fine, he was further directed to

undergo RI for one month.

The petitioner was driving Haryana Roadways bus,

CRIMINAL REVISION NO.2629 OF 2011 :{ 2 }:

which hit the scooter. The petitioner claims that he is an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top