HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR – Respondent
/3806/2016
COMPENSATION - SECTION 357(3) CR.P.C. - FINE - SECTION 143 NI ACT - [AFTER AWARDING SENTENCE OF FINE, COURT CANNOT PASS ORDER DIRECTING ACCUSED TO PAY COMPENSATION UNDER SECTION 357(3) CR.P.C. HOWEVER, IN CASE WHERE COURT HAS NOT IMPOSED FINE, IT CAN ORDER ACCUSED TO PAY COMPENSATION UNDER SECTION 357(3) CR.P.C.]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque and was sentenced to one year imprisonment and a fine of ₹5,000. The complainant filed a revision petition seeking enhancement of sentence, and the Additional Sessions Judge directed the petitioner to pay ₹2,00,000 as compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. The petitioner challenged this order, arguing that the court could not order compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. since a fine had already been imposed.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C., compensation can only be awarded when fine does not form part of the sentence. However, in this case, the petitioner was sentenced to both imprisonment and fine. Therefore, the court could not have ordered compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C.
Issues: Whether the court can order compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. when a fine has already been imposed.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Supreme Court decisions in State of Punjab Versus Gurmej Singh and R. Vijayan Versus Baby to hold that compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. cannot be awarded when a fine has been imposed.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision petition but modified the sentence imposed by the trial court by deeming the fine to be enhanced to ₹2,05,000, out of which ₹5,000 had already been paid, and the remaining amount was to be paid as compensation to the complainant under Section 357(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CRR No. 3806 of 2016 (O&M)
Date of Decision:09.01.2023
Manoj Kumar
.....Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and another
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:-
Mr. Himanshu Puri, Advocate for Mr. Sunny K. Singla,
Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Khaira, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Ishan Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Gagandeep Singh,
Advocate for respondent No.2.
****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
CRM-32584-2016
This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is for
condoning the delay of 372 days in filing the present revision.
Heard.
Considering the grounds mentioned in the application supported
by the affidavit of the petitioner Manoj, the application is allowed. Delay of
372 days in filing the revision is condoned.
CRR-3806-2016
This revision is directed against order dated 02.07.2015 passed
by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, whereby petitioner-accused
has been directed to pay compensation of ₹2,00,000/- under Section 357(3)
of the Cr.P.C. to respondent No.2-complainant; and in default of payment of
the same, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 4 months.
2.
On perusal of the paper-book, it is revealed that cheque dated
14.06.2011 for an amount of ₹10,30,940/- issued by the petitioner-accused
NEETIKA TUTEJA
2023.01.11 05:07
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
CRR-3806-2016 (O&M)
Manoj Kumar in favour of complainant-respondent No.2 Rajiv Kumar Jain, was
dishonoured due to 'insufficient funds' in the account of the accused. After making
compliance of the statutory requirements, complaint was filed, in which after
holding necessary trial, conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act of the accused-petitioner was recorded by learned Trial Court on
14.07.2014. Petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a
period of one year and to pay fine of ₹5,000/- for committing the said offence.
3.
Against the above-said conviction & sentence, petitioner-accused
filed appeal seeking acquittal; whereas complainant-respondent No.2 filed
revision for enhancement of sentence.
4.
Learned Additional Session Judge, Sangrur, though dismissed the
appeal of the accused-petitioner but partly accepted the revision for enhancement
of sentence on 02.07.2015. Vide this order, petitioner was directed to pay an
amount of ₹2,00,000/- as compensation to the complainant-respondent No.2 and
in default of payment of the same, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period
of four months.
5.
It is the above-said order, which is assailed by the accused-petitioner
by way of present revision. It is submitted that as per the settled proposition of
law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in R. Vijayan V.Baby & Anr.
2011(4) RCR (Criminal) 743, after awarding sentence of fine, the Court cannot
pass order, directing the accused to pay compensation under Section 357(3)
Cr.P.C. As in the present case, learned JMIC, Malerkotla vide judgment dated
14.07.2014 had already imposed a fine of ₹5000/-, so in such circumstances
learned Additional Session Judge could not order payment of compensation of
₹2,00,000/- under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. and so, the impugned order is illegal,
Page No. 2 out of 8 pages
NEETIKA TUTEJA
2023.01.11 05:07
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
CRR-3806-2016 (O&M)
arbitrary and perverse. It is also submitted that petitioner has already completed
his sentence. Besides, complainant-respondent No.2 has already filed civil suit for
recovery of ₹14,02,118/-, which has been dismissed by the trial Court on
08.07.2016. With these submissions, prayer is made to set aside the impugned
order.
6.
Refuting the aforesaid contentions, it is submitted by learned counsel
for the complainant-respondent No.2 that learned Additional Sessions Judge has
rightly relied upon Ajay Bansal V. Smt. Nirmal Jain, (P&H) : Law Finder Doc
Id # 113957 to grant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.