HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MAHEE SANDHU AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
YADVINDER SINGH SANDHU AND ORS – Respondent
/305/2017
VIDEO CONFERENCING - EVIDENCE - RECORDING - OVERSEAS WITNESS - [The court allowed the recording of evidence of an overseas witness through video conferencing, as per the guidelines laid down by the court for the conduct of court proceedings between courts and remote sites.]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners filed a suit through their mother, who resided in Canada, and sought permission to record her evidence through video conferencing as it would not be possible for her to come to India.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the recording of evidence of the overseas witness through video conferencing, as per the guidelines laid down by the court for the conduct of court proceedings between courts and remote sites.
Issues: Whether the statement of an overseas witness can be recorded through video conferencing.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the guidelines laid down by it for the conduct of court proceedings between courts and remote sites, which provide that where the person to be examined is overseas, the coordinator shall be the official of Consulate/Embassy of India, who shall also verify the identity of the person to be examined.
Final Decision: The court allowed the revision petition and set aside the order of the trial court which had declined the application for permission to record the evidence of the overseas witness through video conferencing.
203
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CR-305-2017 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 09.01.2023
Mahee Sandhu and Another
....Petitioners
VERSUS
Yadvinder Singh Sandhu and Others
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present:
Mr. Kanwar Abhay Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5.
-.-
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
The present revision has been filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 09.09.2016 whereby
the application for permission to record the evidence by way of video
conferencing of Rupjinder Kaur Sandhu was declined.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the
present suit has been filed by the minors through their mother Rupjinder
Kaur Sandhu, who resides in Canada, and that it would not be possible for
her to come to India to get her statement recorded and therefore she had
moved an application for recording of her statement through video
conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further referred to the
Video Conferencing guidelines for the conduct of Court Proceedings
between Courts and Remote Sites and the Video Conferencing facilities set
TRIPTI SAINI
2023.01.10 10:24
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
CR-305-2017 (O&M)
-2-
up at other places in the States of Punjab, Haryana and U.T. Chandigarh to
contend that detailed guidelines have been laid down for conducting of
examination of persons who are over-seas and in such a case where the
person is overseas, the Coordinator would be an official of
Consulate/Embassy of India who shall also verify the identity of the person
to be examined.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent has contended
that there would be the time difference and hence it would not be possible
to get the statement recorded by way of video conferencing.
Heard.
In the present case the limited prayer is that the statement of
Rupjinder Kaur Sandhu be recorded by way of video conferencing. This
Court has laid down detailed guidelines for the conduct of Court
Proceedings between Courts and Remote Sites and the Video Conferencing
facilities set up at other places in the States of Punjab, Haryana and U.T.
Chandigarh. Guideline No.3.4(i) reads as under :
“3.4 The Co-ordinator at the remote point may be any
of the following:-
i)
Where the person to be examined is overseas, the
Co-ordinator shall be the official of Consulate/Embassy
of India, who shall also verify the identity of the person
to be examined.
xxx ”
TRIPTI SAINI
2023.01.10 10:24
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
CR-305-2017 (O&M)
-3-
In view of the fact that detailed guidelines have already been
laid down, I do not see any reason to deny the petitioners’ the right to get
Rupjinder Kaur Sandhu examined by way of video conferencing.
In view of the above, the present revision petition is allowed
and the order dated 09.09.2016 is set aside. The Trial Court shall get the
statement of Rupjinder Kaur Sandhu recorded by way of video
conferencing inconsonance with the guidelines laid down by this Court.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
January 09, 2023
(ALKA SARIN)
tripti
JUDGE
NOTE : Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking
Whether reportable : YES/NO
TRIPTI SAINI
2023.01.10 10:24
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.