HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AMIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Revision No.206 of 2015
Date of Decision: 03.12.2015
Amit Kumar
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab & another
...Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see
judgment?
2. To be referred to reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:- Mr. Ashok Giri, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate
for respondent no.2.
*****
HARI PAL VERMA J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the
matter has been finally decided by the trial Court, the present
petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
December 03, 2015
( HARI PAL VERMA )
AK
JUDGE
ASHWANI KUMAR
2015.12.04 10:43
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
High Court Chandigarh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.