SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAM PARKASH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

RFA No. 1103 of 2003 (O&M)

Ram Parkash and others

..... Appellants

vs

State of Haryana and another

..... Respondents

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

Present:

Mr. Anil Kumar Malik, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

Rajesh Bindal J.

The landowners are in appeal before this court against the award of

the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act,

1894 (for short, 'the Act') seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired

land.

Briefly, the facts of the case are that State of Haryana vide

notification dated 2.3.1993 issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired land

situated within the revenue estate of Villages Taraf Afgan, Malik Ugra Kheri and

Ugra Kheri, Tehsil and District Panipat for development and utilisation thereof as

residential, industrial and commercial area for Sector-24, Panipat. The Land

Acquisition Collector assessed the compensation for the land of different villages

at different rates. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court

below determined the market value of the acquir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top