SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PIRTHIPAL SINGH @ PRITHIPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SATISH KUMAR – Respondent


120

CR-2560-2022

PIRTHIPAL SINGH @ PRITHIPAL SINGH

V/S

SATISH KUMAR

Present:

Mr.Sunny K. Singla, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr.Liaqat Ali, Advocate

for the respondent.

*****

Challenge in the present revison petition is to the order dated

19.05.2022 (Annexure P-7) and 19.10.2021 (Annexure P-6), passed by learned

Civil Judge (Junior Division), whereby, an application for staying the execution

proceedings, till the decision of application under Order 9 Rule 7 and 13 CPC

read with Section 151 CPC, has been dismissed.

As culled out from the paper book, initially the suit for recovery of

Rs.13,32,000/- was filed and the same was decreed vide judgment and decree

dated 24.01.2017, which was decreed ex-parte. The principal amount to be

recovered was Rs.12 lakh. Thereupon, execution petition was filed for recovery

of the aforesaid decretal amount. However, even the petitioner had filed an

application under Order 9 Rule 7 and 13 CPC, which is pending adjudication.

During the pendency of the application under Order 9 Rule 7 and

13 CPC, an application for stay of the execution proceedings was filed, which

has been dismissed by the Court concerned.

From the grounds of petition, it is e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top