SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3040

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ARCHANA PURI, J
SARABJIT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
VARINDER SINGH @ VARINDER SINGH MULTANI – Respondent
HMA/221/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Manish Bhoria, Mr. Kanhiya Soni
For the Respondents: Mr. Akhil Dadwal

The court prioritizes the convenience of the wife in divorce proceedings, allowing transfer despite the respondent's overseas representation.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The case involves transfer of a matrimonial petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Facts of the Case: The applicant seeks transfer from Mukerian to Derabassi due to difficulties commuting 480 kilometers to defend her divorce petition.

Findings of Court:
The court supports the wife’s convenience for transferring the case based on her lack of income and the distance involved.

Issues: The court considered whether the transfer of the petition would serve justice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the wife's convenience in matrimonial disputes, stating, 'generally, the Courts lean towards convenience of the wife.'

Result: The transfer application is hereby allowed and the petition is transferred as requested.

ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)

The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/221/2023, titled ‘Varinder Singh @ Varinder Singh Multani Vs. Sarabjit Kaur’, filed by the respondent-husband, pending in the Family Court (Camp Court) Mukerian, District Hoshiarpur and she seeks transfer of Anu

2025.05.29 10:39 the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Derabassi, District SAS Nagar.

Upon notice, the respondent made appearance through counsel and filed reply.

The counsel for the parties heard.

At the very outset, it is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 24.02.2019, but no child was born from the said wedlock. However, on account of the matrimonial dispute, the parties are residing separate. Also, it is submitted that the applicant is not having any source of earning. She is dependent upon her brothers, who are indulging in labour work. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that is is difficult for the applicant to commute a distance of about 480 kilometres, to and fro, from the place of her residence, to defend the divorce petition.

On the other hand, the counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent is residing abroad. He has executed Special Power of Attorney, in favour of his mother-Surjit Kaur, who pursues the divorce petition and therefore, it shall be difficult for his mother also, in case the divorce petition is transferred.

In view of the rival submissions aforesaid, it is pertinent to mention that even though, the counsel for the respondent is residing abroad, but there is no mention made, with regard to this assertion in the reply. Also, in the divorce petition, copy whereof is Annexure P-1, there is no mention Anu

2025.05.29 10:39 made about the respondent to be residing abroad, though, it is stated about the petition to have been filed through Surjit Kaur, wife of Jagir Singh.

In the light of the aforesaid, it is pertinent to mention that generally, the Courts lean towards convenience of the wife, while dealing with the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial disputes, though, it is not a thumb rule. However, various circumstances coming forth from the material brought on record, ought to be taken into consideration. In the case in hand, the applicant is not having any source of earning and she is totally dependent upon her brothers, who are indulging in labour work. Besides the same, the distance between the two places is a material factor, which is about 240 kilometres on one side. In view of the same, it shall be inconvenient for the applicant, to defend the divorce petition. So far as the assertion of the respondent residing abroad is concerned, as observed aforesaid, there is nothing on record to prove the factum of his residing abroad. No address of his staying abroad has been mentioned even in the divorce petition.

In view of the aforesaid fact situation, even though, the divorce petition has been filed by the respondent through attorney-holder, who is his mother, but however, when the applicant is not having any source of earning, it is just and expedient to accept the application. Hence, the transfer application is hereby allowed and the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/221/2023, titled ‘Varinder Singh @ Varinder Singh Multani Vs. Sarabjit Kaur’, filed by the respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court (Camp Court) Mukerian, District Anu

2025.05.29 10:39 Hoshiarpur, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Derabassi, District SAS Nagar. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court (Camp Court) Mukerian, to the District and Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar.

Learned District and Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, shall assign the said petition to the Family Court (Camp Court) Derabassi. Even, the parties are directed to appear before the Family Court (Camp Court)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top