IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

123 CR-2685-2023(O&M)

Date of decision: 28.04.2025 M/s The Panipat Woolen & General Mills Company Limited & Another ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Surinder Kumar & Others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr.Ravish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 5.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Revision Petition has been filed by the defendant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 27.03.2023 (Annexure P4) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panipat whereby application dated 08.12.2022 (Annexure P3) filed by the petitioners for additional evidence, has been dismissed.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the said application of the petitioners could not have been dismissed as the documents sought to be produced by the petitioners are necessary for proper adjudication of the matter. It is submitted that at the time of an SUNENA

2025.04.30 11:52 application for additional evidence, what is to be seen is the relevancy of the documents sought to be adduced as evidence. However, there is no