SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3194

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAJBIR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (Sr. No.116) CWP No. 11655 of 2025 Date of decision: 29.04.2025 Rajbir and others ..... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Rohan Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A. G. Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG, Haryana and Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.

* * *

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral (1) Through the instant petition the petitioners, primarily relying on Section 101A of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short – 2013 Act), seek release of their acquired land in village Tigra, Tehsil and Distt.

Gurugram, Haryana.

(2) After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record the undisputed facts which emerge are as follows :-

(3) Through notification dated 24.08.2000 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short – 1894 Act) the State of Haryana sought to acquire land in village Tigra, Tehsil and Distt. Gurugram which included the land owned and possessed by the petitioners.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top