SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3336

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RULDA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


280 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1326-2010 (O&M) Decided on:30.04.2025 Rulda Singh .... Petitioner versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Ms. Parminder Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Sukhjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab.

****

Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral)

1. This revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 17.04.2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib vide which, judgment of conviction and order on quantum of sentence dated 18.03.2009 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Amloh have been upheld, in case stemming from FIR No.2 dated 12.01.2003 registered under Sections 279/337/338/304-A IPC at Police Station Amloh and the petitioner was sentenced as under :

Offence Sentence
Section 279 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of five months.
Section 338 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of eight months.
Section 304-A IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, further undergo RI for one month
All the sentences were ord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top