HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SHEEL NAGU, CJ, SANJIV BERRY, J
Authum Investment & Infrastructure Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Additional District Magistrate, Ludhiana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed concerning non-execution of an order. (Para 1) |
| 2. jurisdictional duties and obligations under the sarfaesi act. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. directive for compliance and physical possession within 30 days. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral )
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner Bank, aggrieved by non-execution of the order dated 11.11.2020 (Annexure P-3) passed by Additional District Magistrate, Ludhiana (respondent No.1) under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, ‘ SARFAESI Act ’).
2. The Apex Court in R.D. Jain & Co. Vs. Capital First Limited and others, (2023) 1 SCC 675, while explaining the width of jurisdiction under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act , held thus :
“23. However, for taking physical possession of the secured assets in terms of Section 14 (1) of the SARFAESI Act , the secured creditor is obliged to approach the CMM/DM by way of a written application requesting for taking possession of the secured assets and documents relating thereto and for being forwarded to it (secured creditor) for further action. The statutory obligati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.