Back
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J
SI Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for promotion based on past service (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments concerning the nature of the penalization (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's interpretation of promotion rules and past judgments (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's ruling on rejection of the promotion claim (Para 9) |
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of communication dated 13.03.2025 (Annexure P-22) whereby respondent has rejected his claim for deemed date of promotion as Inspector.
2. The petitioner was enrolled as Constable on 01.11.1991. He was promoted as Head Constable on 04.08.2006. He was further promoted as Assistant Sub Inspector on 27.11.2014 and Sub Inspector on 26.07.2024. The respondent initiated departmental proceedings against him alleging misconduct while investigating case of FIR No.239 dated 30.07.2017, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 473 and 120-B of IPC and 61/1/14 of Excise Act, 1944, registered at Police Station, Pinjore, Panchkula. The Enquiry PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI Officer found him guilty. The Disciplinary Authority issued him show cause notice dated 28.01.2021 proposing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
