SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 3703

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J
JAGPAL SINGH @ JAGPAL – Appellant
Versus
RANBIR SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma
For the Respondents:

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral)

1. The present appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree passed by learned First Appellate Court, Palwal, vide which, the decree passed by learned Civil Judge was set aside.

2. Briefly, the suit was filed for cancellation of three transfer deeds dated 26.02.2007 and 16.03.2007. The appellant-petitioner contested the suit by moving an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC for rejection of the plaint on the grounds that the deeds are registered deeds and act of registration amounts to a notice to the whole world, as such, the suit should have been filed within a period of three years as per Article 59 of Limitation Act from the date of registration of the deeds, whereas, the suit was filed after 14 years, so the suit is hopelessly barred.

3. Learned Civil Judge allowed the application and rejected the plaint.

4. Aggrieved by the order so passed, respondent/plaintiff preferred an appeal, which was allowed by learned Additional District Judge, Palwal. Now, the judgment and decree so passed is assailed on the grounds by the appellant that the learned First Appellate Court has not taken into consideration that registration of deed is a notice to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top