ANKUSH DHANERWAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J
ANKUSH DHANERWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. J.S. Rattu, Mr. Ankur Bali

Table of Content
1. claim for security against threats (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. inaction of police despite serious allegations (Para 3 , 4 , 12)
3. cbi referral for investigation (Para 15)

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing the respondents to provide security for the protection of life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members, who apprehends danger at the hands of respondents No.5 and 6.

2. In addition to above, legal action has also been sought on the complaints dated 02.06.2025 and 23.07.2025, pursuant to which the petitioner has sought registration of an FIR.

3. Respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Mohali, and Respondent No.4-Senior Superintendent of Police, UT Chandigarh are hereby directed to examine the representations dated 02.06.2025 and 23.07.2025 (Annexures P-2 and P-3 respectively), along with the online complaint dated 23.07.2025 (Annexure P-4), and take appropriate action if the authorities deem it necessary, to provide security for the life and liberty of the petitioner.

4. During the course of hearing, certain glaring fact

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHSANDEEP MOUDGIL, JANKUSH DHANERWAL – AppellantVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J
ANKUSH DHANERWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent