Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANDEEP PANNU, J
KARAN TAAZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of allegations against the petitioner. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments surrounding anticipatory bail. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. considerations for balancing individual rights with societal impacts. (Para 4) |
| 4. judicial principles regarding custodial interrogation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court's conclusion on the necessity for investigation. (Para 8) |
| 6. final decision of the court. (Para 9) |
MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)
1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.499 dated 03.07.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420 of IPC, at Police Station Karnal Sadar, District Karnal, Haryana.
2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with other co-accused induced the complainant by promising to send his son abroad.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no concern with the alleged transactions between the complainant and other co-accused persons and there is no documentary evidence such as agreements, receipts, or acknowledgments linking the petitioner to the complainant, nor any documents bear his signatures, handwriting, or seal. He further contends that the alleged chequ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
