In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Reserved On: 25.09.2025 Pronounced On: 01.10.2025 Sonia Kapil ... Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s)

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present: Mr. Anjaneya Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Arun Kumar Gujjar, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Mrigank Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1. The quashing of order dated 29.11.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Sonepat, hereinafter being referred to as trial Court only, has been sought.

2. By virtue of above mentioned order in a complaint filed by the respondent No.2/complainant, hereinafter being referred to as the respondent No.2 only, for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, hereinafter referred as “the NIA”

only, the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner.

3. Since the petitioner has been summoned to face trial as an accused, she is aggrieved of the above mentioned order.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ

4. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent No.2 is a company