SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anoop Chitkara, J
Jaskaran Singh @ Jaskaran Singh @ Gosha – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Tarun Singla
For the Respondents: Jasdev Singh Thind

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

61 29.03.2025 Talwandi Sabo, 111 of BNS, 2023 District Bathinda

1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, [ BNSS ], seeking regular bail.

2. Per paragraph 11 of the bail application and para 11(D) of the reply, the petitioner has the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No. FIR No. Date Offenses Police Station
1. 18 23.02.2024 21B/61/85 of NDPS Act Talwandi Sabo, District Bathinda
2. 61 29.03.2025 111 BNS Talwandi Sabo, District Bathinda

3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the order dated 16.05.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda, which reads as follows:

“As per prosecution story, the police of PS Talwandi Sabo got a lead against the applicant and co-accused Varinder Singh @ Vimpi and Varinder Singh @ Bindi regarding their indulgence in the commission of various acts of looting etc. The police record revealed the involvement of the applicant and other co-accused in previous similar incidents and other criminal cases. Believing the information being credible, a formal FIR wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top