Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J
Baba Gurpinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commissioner Appeals Punjab and others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review procedure disregarded due to long delay. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. pending civil suit impacts maintainability of writ petition. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. constructive res judicata prevents simultaneous proceedings. (Para 5 , 6) |
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1. On 12.08.2025, the following order was passed:-
“ xxx xxx xxx Inter alia contends that Collector by impugned order reviewed order of Assistant Collector Grade-I with respect to mutation of lease deed. The order of review was passed in terms of Section 15 of Punjab Land Revenue Act , 1887 (in short ‘1887 Act’). As per said provision, application seeking review could be filed within 90 days whereas application in the instant case was filed after 25 years. The private respondents raised the issue before Civil Court and dragged the matter up to this Court. Thus, there was no occasion for the Collector to review the order passed by Assistant Collector. The Financial Commissioner (Appeals) has mechanically dismissed revision under Section 16 of 1887 Act.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG Punjab and Mr. Naveen Bawa, Advocate, who on advance notice are present in Court accept notice on behalf of State and private respondents, respec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
