IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, RAMESH KUMARI, JJ
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
EX NAIK PUNJAB SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
1. In the present writ petition, the challenge is to the order dated 17.04.2023 (Annexure P-1) by which, directions were given to the Union of India (petitioners herein) to grant service pension for second spell of service in the Defence Security Corps (herein after referred to ‘DSC’) to respondent No.1, who was re-enrolled in DSC on 22.09.2006 and discharged from second spell of service on 31.07.2021 on attaining the age of superannuation after rendering 14 years, 10 months and 09 days of qualifying service, by condoning shortfall of 52 days and considering his service as 15 complete years as qualifying service as per the judgment in Original Application No.1238 of 2016 with MA No.923 of 2016 decided on 01.10.2019 titled Smt. Shama Kaur vs. Union of India and others , which judgment has also been implemented but, when the said judgment was relied upon at a later point of time by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, an appeal preferred by the Union of India, whereby, an interim order was granted and therefore, till the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) No.27725-2024, is passed the operation of the impugned order passed by the Tribu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.