IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 25.09.2025 Rama Verma ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ravi Sharma, Standing Counsel, and Mr. Raywant Kaushik, Advocate, for the respondent-UGC.

Mr. S.P. Arora, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate, (Legal Aid Counsel)

for respondent No.5, along with respondent No.5.

****

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral)

1. A communication/letter dated 05.09.2023 (Annexure P-17), issued by Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak-respondent No.4, vide which, a direction has been passed upon the petitioner to submit her original documents of B.A. 2^nd and 3^rd year, to enable the University to take further action, has propelled her to beseech indulgence of this Court, by filing instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.

2. In brief, the undisputed facts of the case are that, the petitioner had enrolled for Bachelor of Arts, in the academic session

2007-08, which was to be concluded in the year 2010-11. Accordingly, she successful