Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Vikas Bahl, J
Shiv Kumar and another – Appellant
Versus
Shri Tara Devi Temple and others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impleadment of necessary parties for proper adjudication (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. expeditious disposal of pending applications with clear directions (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
CM-20717-CII-2023
1. This is an application under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for impleadment of applicants as respondents No.4-A and 4-B in the present revision petition.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants has submitted that it is the present applicants who had filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC and on whose application the impugned order had been passed, but the petitioners have not impleaded the applicants as parties.
3. Keeping in view of the above-said facts and circumstances and also the averments made in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and the applicants are ordered to be impleaded as respondents No.4-A and 4-B in the present revision petition.
The amended memo of parties is taken on record.
CR-4115-2023
1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 24.05.2023 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Additional District Judge, Jind.
2. Le
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
