SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4222

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J
Lakhvir Singh and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab and others – Respondent
CWP-28550-2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rashpinder Singh Sohi
For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab, Mr. Dipankar Aggarwal

Executive instructions cannot override statutory rules related to pay fixation, upholding the principle of equal pay for equal work.

Headnote:(A) Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India - Statutory Rules and Executive Instructions - Petitioners contest the non-implementation of statutory pay scales as per applicable rules - Court affirms that executive instructions cannot supersede statutory rules. (Paras 10, 11, 12).

(B) Employment Law - Equal Pay for Equal Work - Court upholds the right to statutory pay as rights contained within enacted rules - Unlawful discrimination in pay fixation violates fundamental rights of similarly situated employees. (Paras 3, 4, 8).

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, appointed under statutory rules, challenge the implementation of lower pay scales through executive instructions, claiming an entitlement to the statutory pay scales laid out in applicable rules since their appointments. (Paras 2-4).

Findings of Court:
The executive instructions cannot override existing statutory rules prescribing pay scales; the petitioners are entitled to pay fixation as per statutory rules, with resultant benefits to be paid within three months. (Paras 12).

Issues: Whether executive instructions can override statutory rules relating to pay fixation, and implications for equal pay rights. (Paras 3, 4).

Ratio Decidendi: Statutory rules have precedence over executive instructions, which cannot amend or supersede rules established by law. Thus, entitlement to pay according to statutory rules is legally enforced. (Paras 10, 11).

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. statutory rules govern pay scales. (Para 1 , 2)
2. executive instructions cannot alter statutory laws. (Para 3 , 4)
3. statutory rules must be adhered to for pay determination. (Para 10 , 11)
4. writ petition allows enforcement of statutory pay rules. (Para 12 , 13)

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India , is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioners as per The Punjab State Electricity Board Ministerial Services Group-III Rules, 1985, The Punjab State Electricity Board Technical Services Grade-III Rules, 1996 and The Revised Pay Scale Rules, 2009, from entry into the service along with arrears and interest @ 12% thereon. Further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to take into account the statutory pay scale as per The Punjab State Electricity Board Ministerial Services Group-III Rules, 1985, The Punjab State Electricity Board Technical Services Grade-III Rules, 1996 and The Revised Pay Scale Rules, 2009. Further a writ of certiorari has been sought, for quashing the Instructions dated 17.07.2020 (Annexure P-3).

2. The brief facts of the case, as pleaded in the writ petition, are that the petitioners were appointed as Clerks and Assistant Linemen in the erstwhile Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB) through an advertisement dated 21.05.2021 (Annexure P-1). Despite the statutory pay scales prescribed under the Punjab State Electricity Board Ministerial Services Group-III Rules, 1985, the Technical Services Grade-III Rules, 1996, and the Revised Pay Scale Rules, 2009, which included a pay scale of Rs.6400-20200 with a Grade Pay of Rs.3400, the petitioners were given a consolidated pay of Rs.19,900/- on account of the State Government Instructions dated 17.07.2020 (Annexure P-3). These instructions, which implemented the 7th Central Pay Commission pay matrix, were adopted by the respondents without amending or repealing the statutory rules. The employees appointed before 17.07.2020 continue to draw higher statutory pay scale for performing the same duties, resulting in unequal treatment and financial loss to the petitioners. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioners made a representation dated 15.05.2025 seeking correction of the pay scale, but no relief has been granted to them. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that the service conditions and pay scales for Clerks and Assistant Linemen are governed by the statutory Rules specifically enacted for the PSEB employees namely, The Punjab State Electricity Board Ministerial Services Group-III Rules, 1985, The Punjab State Electricity Board Technical Services Grade-III Rules, 1996 and The Revised Pay Scale Rules, 2009. He emphasized that these Rules possess statutory force and cannot be overridden by mere executive instructions or letters. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the respondents’ adoption of the 7th CPC pay scale vide impugned instructions dated 17.07.2020 is contrary to the statutory framework and thus legally unsustainable. The Rules have not been amended or repealed to incorporate the 7th CPC pay matrix and, therefore, the petitioners are entitled to pay fixation as per the existing statutory Rules. He further contends that Government Orders or Instructions cannot replace or change the Rules enacted by law and further the right to “equal pay for equal work” is protected under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India . Lastly, he submits that the discrimination in pay fixation violates the fundamental rights of the petitioners as similarly situated employees appointed before the Notification dated 17.07.2020, continue to receive the higher pay scale. It is a trite law that the executive instructions in the shape of circulars cannot supersede the statutory rules.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in support

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top