Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sanjay Vashisth, J
Palwinder Kumar Dhir (since deceased) through LRs – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Pal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for leave to appeal following a judgment of acquittal. (Para 1) |
| 2. clarification of victim's rights under section 372 concerning appeals. (Para 2) |
SANJAY VASHISTH, J.
1. Applicant – Palwinder Kumar Dhir (since deceased) through LRs has filed the present application seeking grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 08.11.2024, passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nakodar, in Complaint case bearing No. NACT-167-2019, instituted on 09.08.2019, under Section(s) 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 read with Section 420 IPC, titled as ‘Palwinder Kumar Dhir (since deceased) through LRs v. Narinder Pal’, whereby the complaint filed by the applicant(s) herein has been dismissed by acquitting the accused.
2. Shorn off the factual matrix of the present case, it is suffice to notice that in the recent mandate of law laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court, in the case of M/s Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran etc. [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1868-70 of 2025, decided on 08.04.2025, reported as 2025 (3) RCR (Criminal) 208 : Law Finder Doc Id # 2737710 : 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320], their Lordships’ have answered the issue in aff
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
