SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 4479

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Yashvir Singh Rathor, J
Nazar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Crl. Revision No.2711 of 2010



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Arun Abrol, Parminder Singh-I
For the Respondents: Gorav Kathuria

The court upheld the conviction based on clear evidence of negligence while granting probation due to the lengthy trial and the accused's personal circumstances.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 279, 337, 338 - Road traffic accident - Conviction under various IPC sections affirmed based on evidence of eyewitnesses and medical reports - Court considers past conduct of accused and allows probation for good conduct after 21 years of trial. The petitioner to pay Rs.15,000/- as compensation to the injured. (Paras 1, 10, 11)

(B) Probation - Scope - The court exercises its discretion for probation based on reformation potential and the impact of ongoing trial on personal circumstances of the accused. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The incident occurred on 30.01.2004, resulting in injuries to two individuals due to an accident caused by the petitioner's reckless driving. The trial court sentenced the petitioner, affirming the conviction upon appeal.

Findings of Court:
The accident was confirmed by eyewitness and medical evidence, solidifying the conviction. The court modified the sentence to probation due to the prolonged trial and the accused's remorse.

Issues: The primary issue revolved around the petitioner’s culpability for the accident and sentencing considerations after a prolonged trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the conviction citing strong evidence while recognizing the need for leniency in sentencing owing to the petitioner’s background and the duration of the trial.

Result: Revision dismissed with modified sentencing; probation granted and compensation ordered.

Table of Content
1. accident caused by negligent driving leading to injuries. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. conviction supported by eyewitness and medical evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. discussion on petitioner's situation and potential for reform. (Para 8 , 9)
4. balance of justice with leniency in sentencing after prolonged trial. (Para 10 , 11)

Yashvir Singh Rathor, J. (Oral)

1. Pe(cid:5)(cid:5)oner – accused namely Nazar Singh was held guilty and convicted by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Barnala vide judgment dated 04.09.2009 for the offences under Sec(cid:5)ons 279/337/338 IPC and sentenced under Sec(cid:5)on 279 IPC to undergo RI for a period of six months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, he was to undergo RI for a period of 15 days, under Sec(cid:5)on 337 IPC, to undergo RI for a period of six months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, he was to undergo RI for a period of 15 days and under Sec(cid:5)on 338 IPC, to undergo RI for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, he was to undergo RI for a period of 15 days in case FIR No.16 dated 30.01.2004 registered under Sec(cid:5)ons 279, 337, 338 IPC at Police Sta(cid:5)on Dhanoula. Appeal filed by him was dismissed by the Appellate Court on 14.09.2010.

2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 30.01.2004, one ruqa was received from Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, Dhanoula to the effect that Balwinder Singh s/o Jagroop Singh and Cheena Singh son of Jangir Singh have been admitted in Civil Hospital, Dhanoula on account of injuries having been suffered by them in a road traffic accident. Thereafter, ASI Ravinder Kumar, In- charge Police Post, Badbar was informed who reached the Civil Hospital, Dhanoula but both the injured were unfit to make statement. However, one Jasbir Singh son of Natha Singh got recorded his statement to the effect that on 30.01.2004, he along with one Balwinder Singh son of Sohan Singh was going from Village Badbar towards Dhanoula on his scooter, while Balwinder Singh son of Jagroop Singh and Cheena Singh, were going ahead of them on their scooter which was being driven by Balwinder Singh son of Jagroop Singh. At about 10:45 a.m., when they reached near Dera Sant Kartar Village Badbar, one Tata Sumo bearing No. HR-01L-0339 came from the opposite side of Dhanoula at a high speed and hit the scooter being driven by Balwinder Singh son of Jagroop Singh, as a result of which, Balwinder Singh and Cheena Singh suffered injuries. The driver of the offending vehicle stopped at the spot and on inquiry, he disclosed his name as Nazar Singh son of Bachan Singh, resident of Bhaini Vehra, Dhanoula but when people started gathering at the spot, he fled away along with the offending vehicle. Thereafter, injured were taken to the hospital for treatment with the help of passers-by leaving behind Surinder Kumar near the accidental scooter. He alleged that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of offending vehicle make Tata Sumo. On the basis of this information, formal FIR was registered and the matter was investigated. Rough site plan of the place of occurrence was got prepared. Statements of the witnesses were recorded. The medico legal report and treatment report of both the injured were obtained. The ill-fated scooter was taken into possession from the place of accident. On 01.02.2004 accused was arrested and the offending vehicle was taken into possession along with the driving licence of the accused. Both the vehicles were got mechanically examined and after completion of investigation, final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C was prepared and presented in the Court for trial against the accused. On presentation of challan, copy of challan was supplied to the accused as required under Section 207 Cr.P.C and after hearing the Public Prosecutor and the accused, a prima-facie offence punishable under Sections 279

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top