Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, VIKAS SURI, JJ
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
EX NAIK KULWANT SINGH AND ANOTHER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility criteria for service pension. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. importance of adherence to established precedents. (Para 2 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. condonation of service period issues. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. ongoing higher court proceedings impact. (Para 5 , 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal of the petition. (Para 12 , 13) |
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
1. In the present writ petition, the challenge is to the order dated 21.03.2023 (Annexure P-1) by which, directions were given to the Union of India (petitioners herein) to grant second service pension for service in the Defence Security Corps (herein after referred to ‘DSC’) to respondent No.1 by condoning shortfall of 10 days and considering his service as 15 complete years as qualifying service as per the judgment in Original Application No.1238 of 2016 with MA No.923 of 2016 decided on 01.10.2019 titled Smt. Shama Kaur vs. Union of India and others , which judgment has also been implemented but, when the said judgment was relied upon at a later point of time by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, an appeal preferred by the Union of India, whereby, an interim order was granted and therefore, till the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
