Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri, JJ
Ritu Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for urgent hearing granted. (Para 1) |
| 2. context established regarding promotion eligibility criteria. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. importance of merit benchmarks in promotion decisions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. challenges to promotion denials require compelling evidence. (Para 7) |
| 5. procedural adherence is essential for maintaining application claims. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. no claims raised regarding juniors' promotions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. framing rules and benchmarks for promotions clarified. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. court dismisses the writ petition. (Para 15) |
None for the respondents No. 2 and 3 HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)
CM-13717-CWP-2025 Present application has been filed for fixing the main writ petition at an early actual date.
Notice of the application to the counsel opposite.
Ms. Jyoti Chaudhary, Advocate, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-UOI. She raises no objection for the grant of prayer as raised in the present application.
Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and on the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the main writ petition is tak
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
