Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J
Gagandeep Singh Brar & others – Appellant
Versus
Mandeep Singh & ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. this case concerns the procedural details and initial claims in a land ownership dispute. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the appellants argue for the right to amend their written statement due to new facts raised in replication. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. the court examines the reasoning behind the lower court's dismissal of the amendment request. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. the court reiterates the principle that pleadings must allow for amendments to address new claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. the court allows the amendment application and directs the lower court to accept the new written statement. (Para 13 , 14) |
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.
1. Present revision petition is preferred against order dated 24.03.2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Jagraon, District Ludhiana, whereby the application filed by petitioners/defendant Nos. 2, 4 and 5 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of the written statement, was dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed suit for declaration to the effect that they are owners of the land measuring 125 kanals 5 marlas. Petitioners/defendant Nos. 2, 4 and 5 filed reply to the same denying the ownersh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
