SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 684

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS SURI
Nirmal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Satpal Kanwar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Munish Jolly, Advocate

Judgment :

Vikas Suri, J.

The challenge in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure P-16) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby the review application filed by defendant Nos.1 to 4 for review of the judgment dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure P-5) has been dismissed. The primary contention raised is that the trial Court erred in allowing correction of the judgment under Section 151 and 152, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'CPC'), which powers ought not to have been exercised after passing of the decree, particularly when two significant additional issues, framed as 1(c) and 1(d), were not decided in the judgment sought to be reviewed.

2. For convenience and to avoid confusion, the parties to the instant revision petition, are being referred to by their original status before the trial Court, i.e. petitioner as plaintiff, and respondent Nos.1 to 16 as defendant Nos.1 to 16.

3. Succinctly, the facts relevant for adjudication of the present petition are that the plaintiff (Nirmal Singh) filed a suit, inter alia, for declaration that he is owner of the suit property described in the h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top