SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5090

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUKHBIR SINHGH – Appellant
Versus
RAJA RAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-

RSA-540-1998 (O&M)

Reserved on:-22.09.2025 Date of Decision : 23.09.2025 Sukhbir Singh (since deceased) through LRs ……Appellant versus Raja Ram and Others ….. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for the appellant.

Name of respondent No.1 is deleted from the array of parties Vide order dated 15.01.1999.

Mr. Gurdial Singh Jaswal, Advocate with Mr. Buta Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. This Regular Second Appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 22.12.1997 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jagadhri which reversed the judgment and decree dated 19.04.1995 passed by the learned Sub Judge, Ist Class, Jagadhri. Vide judgment and decree dated 19.04.1995, the trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff Sukhbir Singh. Vide impugned judgment and decree dated 22.12.1997 the learned Additional District Judge, Jagadhri set aside that decree and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.

Brief Facts

2. The plaintiff Sukhbir Singh instituted a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the actual physical

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top