Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Manjari Nehru Kaul, J
Surjit Singh alias Meingal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on procedural adherence. (Para 1 , 2) |
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J.
This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.11.2004 passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Ludhiana, whereby appellant-Surjit Singh alias Meingal Singh-was convicted for an offence under Section 15 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NDPS Act’) and sentenced as follows:
Offence under Section
Period of sentence
Fine imposed
Period of sentence in default of payment of fine
15 of the NDPS Act, 1985.
RI for ten years
`1 lakh
R.I. for six months
2. The appellant challenges his conviction and sentence, urging that the findings of the learned trial Court rest upon infirm evidence, non-compliance with mandatory provisions of law, and disregard of material PUNEET SACHDEVA
2025.09.17 17:21 evidence led by the defence.
3. The case of the prosecution, may be briefly recounted.
4. On 15.04.2002, ASI Teja Singh (PW-4), accompanied by other police officials, was present near Village Kalkh in a Government jeep bearing registration No.PB-25-6798. Around 7:15 AM, a truck bearing registration No.P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
