Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J
RAVINDER AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek promotion as clerks based on instructions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments revolve around proper application of instructions. (Para 3) |
| 3. court clarifies statutory rules govern employment rights. (Para 4) |
| 4. court dismisses writ petition due to lack of merit. (Para 5) |
...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. S.S. Sangwan, Advocate with Mr. Ritesh Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. AG, Haryana ****
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J Vide this common order this Court shall dispose of above said two writ petitions as common question of facts and law is involved therein.
For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from CWP-
4397-2023.
1. Prayer The present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners seeking issuance of direction to the respondents to change the nomenclature of their posts from Storekeeper to Clerk, and thereafter promote them to the post of Assistant, in accordance with certain Government letters, notifications, and purported past practice.
2. Brief Facts The petitioners were appointe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
