Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANDEEP PANNU, J
SUDESH SHARDA – Appellant
Versus
TWINKLE SHARDA AND OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. document central to civil case must not be accessible to criminal investigations. (Para 1 , 4 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. civil courts must adjudicate document genuineness without police intervention. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. jurisdictional errors occur when civil matters are influenced by criminal proceedings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. final decisions should maintain the integrity of civil litigation processes. (Para 16 , 17) |
MANDEEP PANNU, J
1. The petitioner has filed the present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 13.10.2025, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, whereby the application filed by SHO, Police Station New Baradari, Jalandhar, seeking permission to take the original Will dated 16.06.2023 on record of the civil suit for forensic examination (FSL) in connection with FIR No.108/2024 under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, was allowed.
2. Brief facts giving rise to the present petition are that the petitioner–plaintiff has filed a civil suit for declaration and possession on the basis of the Will dated 16.06.2023, executed by late Rajesh Sharda, in her favour.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
