IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Mandeep Pannu, J
Nachhattar Kaur and Others – Appellant
Versus
Harcharan Singh and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim petition filed under article 227 regarding an injunction. (Para 1 , 2) |
MANDEEP PANNU J.
1. The petitioners/defendants have filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the interim order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, in case bearing No. CA–554–2025, whereby during pendency of the appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC, the petitioners/defendants No. 1 to 4 have been restrained from alienating the suit property till the disposal of the said appeal.
Brief Facts
2. The brief facts, as necessary for the disposal of the present petition, are that the plaintiffs/respondents No. 1 and 2 instituted a suit for mandatory injunction directing defendants No. 1 to 4/petitioners to comply with the terms of agreement dated 09.07.2021. Under the said agreement, defendants No. 1 to 4 had allegedly undertaken to take care of multiple litigations concerning the land in dispute, while all expenses were to be borne by the plaintiffs. It was further agreed that once the land is cleared of litigation and mutation of ownership is effected in the name of defendants No. 1 to 4, then upon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.