SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5836

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MAHINDER KAUR AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
DALER SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

215 RSA-1686-2013(O&M)

Date of decision: 12.11.2025 Mahinder Kaur & Others ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Daler Singh ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Kewal Kishan, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants.

Ms. Devanshi Sharma, Advocate Ms. Saksham Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff against the judgment of reversal dated 20.09.2012 passed by Additional District Judge, Karnal whereby Civil Appeal No.209 of 2010 filed by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 11.6.2010 passed by the learned trial court whereby suit of the appellant was only partly decreed, has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff had filed suit for specific performance for Agreement to Sell dated 07.05.2005 along with consequential relief of permanent injunction. It was the pleaded case of the appellant that the parties had entered into an Agreement to Sell that defendant was owner of the suit land as described in the plaint. He had entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 07.05.2005 in favour of the pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top