SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 5848

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BHANMATI – Appellant
Versus
VAIBHAV PRATAP SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 12.11.2025 Bhanma# ...Appellant Versus Vaibhav Pratap Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Mohit, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the appellant.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

It is claimant’s appeal seeking enhancement.

2. In a motor vehicular accident caused due to rash and negligent driving of car No.HR-12-T-0828 on 05.01.2021, the pe##oner Bhanma# i.e. appellant (68 years) herein sustained injuries. She filed a claim pe##on under Sec#on 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking compensa#on against the driver, owner and insurer of the offending vehicle. Learned Tribunal vide an award dated 03.02.2025 awarded the compensa#on of ₹3,26,233/- along with interest of 6% per annum, which is alleged by the appellant to be inadequate.

3. Seeking enhancement, it is argued that no amount was awarded towards aAendant charges, and compensa#on under the head of disability is inadequate.

4. In injury claims, the court must translate medical (physical) disability into func#onal disability vis-à-vis earning capacity; and the assessment depends on the part of the body affected,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top