SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6027

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PAWAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

102 CWP-29018-2025 (O&M)

Date of decision : 07.11.2025 PAWAN KUMAR ...... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA ***

Present :- Mr. R. K. Arora, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jugam Arora, Advocate, Mr. Prabhat K. Jalbera, Advocate and Mr. J. S. Bhogal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab.

***

Deepinder Singh Nalwa, J. (Oral)

1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 10.06.2025 (Annexure P-10) whereby the prayer of the petitioner for promotion from the Master Cadre to the post of Headmaster has been rejected, w.e.f. the date his juniors were promoted, i.e., 21.03.2025. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner belongs to the Scheduled Caste category and joined the Department of Education as a Hindi Master on 11.01.1997. In the seniority list issued by the Department, the petitioner's name figures at serial No.36361. Master Cadre employees are further entitled to promotion to the post of Lecturer and Head Master. The recruitment and conditions of service of Lecturers and Headmasters are governed by the Rules called as Punjab Education Service (School and Inspection) Group-B Rules, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules')). As per the above said Rules, there are two channels of promotion from the Master's cadre i.e. Lecturer as well as Headmaster, on the basis of seniority in the Master Cadre. Both the posts of Lecturer and Headmaster carries the same pay scale.

3. The Department vide notices dated 11.06.2024, 06.07.2024 and 08.07.2024 called cases of Master Cadre employees for the purpose of promotion to the post of Lecturer in different streams. In pursuance to the above said notice, the petitioner submitted his case for consideration for promotion on the post of Lecturer. The Department also called cases for promotion from Master cadre to the post of Headmaster vide notice dated 23.09.2024. The petitioner also applied for consideration for his promotion to the post of Headmaster on 30.09.2024. The case of petitioner was considered for promotion on the post of Lecturer, and vide order dated 21.10.2024, petitioner was promoted on the post of Lecturer. The petitioner joined the post of Lecturer on 23.10.2024.

4. After the petitioner was promoted on the post of Lecturer, promotion orders of the post of Headmaster from the Master Cadre were issued by the Department on 21.03.2025. As per the above said order, large number of persons who were junior to the petitioner, as per the seniority list, were granted promotion on the post of Headmaster.

5. The petitioner filed CWP No.9555 of 2025 before this Court for consideration of his case for promotion on the post of Headmaster from the date his juniors were promoted. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court on 04.04.2025 with a direction to the respondents to consider the application submitted by the petitioner within a period of 04 months.

6. In pursuance to the above said order passed by this Court, the petitioner was called for personal hearing on 14.05.2025 vide letter dated 28.04.2025. After hearing the petitioner, an order dated 10.06.2025 was passed by the Department whereby, the claim of the petitioner for consideration for promotion on the post of Headmaster was rejected on the basis that he has already been promoted as Lecturer on 23.10.2024.

7. Aggrieved against the above said order dated 10.06.2025, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

8. Learned senior counsel submits that the petitioner has a right to be considered for promotion on the post of Headmaster in terms of the Rules even if the petitioner has been promoted on the post of Lecturer. Learned counsel also submits that if, the petitioner had not accepted his promotion on the post of Lecturer, he had to forego promotion for a period of two years as per the instructions issued by the Department, as such

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top